Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Docket 20-1199) and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (Docket 21-707) are a pair of lawsuits concerning racial discrimination in affirmative action programs in college admissions processes. Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service: Jul 25 2022: Brief of Respondent-Students Cecilia Polanco, et al. When the court agreed in January to take up the two cases, it indicated that the cases would be argued and considered . Students for Fair Admissions v. Univ. You can also contact the President of Students for Fair Admissions, Edward Blum, at 703-505-1922. October 31, 2022. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina : "The use of affirmative action to decide who gets to attend which colleges has led to explicit racial discrimination against Asian Americans in particular, and government's treating them differently because of their race is a direct violation of their 14th . The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments Monday on two cases related to the consideration of race in college admissions. of North Carolina. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday on two major cases concerning race-based affirmative action at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) brought suit against Harvard University alleging that their admission processes were discriminating against Asian Applicants in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. This case is no longer consolidated with No. Sep 09 2022 The Lawyers' Committee represents the Students with co-counsel from Asian Americans Advancing Justice Center (AAJC), Boston's Lawyers' For Civil Rights, and Arnold & Porter. Supreme Court Docket No. In reality, SFFA was challenging two different practices: 1) Harvard's (admitted) preference for Black and Hispanic applicants over equally qualified applicants of any other race, and 2) Harvard's (denied) penalization of Asian American applicants vis--vis white applicants. Students for Fair Admissions, a non-profit representing students and others opposed to race-conscious admissions, . Students for Fair Admissions v. Univ. In a packed Boston courtroom Monday, Harvard and the anti-affirmative-action group Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) presented arguments in the first day of trial of a four-year-old civil-rights lawsuit charging that the College's admissions office discriminates against Asian-American students. Students for Fair Admissions has filed lawsuits against the following colleges and universities: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. I started to review the Harvard. Jin Hee Lee, Senior Deputy Director of Litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) delivered the oral argument on behalf of the 26 Harvard student and alumni organizations serving as amici. Our mission is to support and participate in litigation that will restore the original principles of our nation's civil rights movement: A student's race and ethnicity should not be factors that either harm or help that student to gain admission to a competitive university. I started to review the Harvard case, but didn't get a chance to finish it yet. Justices are holding oral arguments for two cases involving race-based admissions, with the court's leading conservatives including Clarence Thomas expected to roll back decades of precedent. The US Supreme Court Monday heard oral arguments Monday in two cases challenging the validity of race-conscious affirmative action programs in college admission. Case Information Parties Petitioner: Students for Fair Admission Respondents: University of North Carolina and students Question Presented October 31, 2022. SCOTUSblog Coverage Written By Anoa . Students for Fair Admission v. President & Fellows of Harvard College Oral Argument. The justices will hear oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College on Oct. 31, the first day of the November session. Facts of the casePetitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued the University of North Carolina (UNC) over its admissions process, alleging that the pr. Today, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), a nonprofit organization with over 20,000 members, filed its opening brief in two cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. June 3, 2020 Students file a motion seeking to participate in oral argument before the First Circuit. 2000d. Argument Audio Calendars and Lists Courtroom Seating Oral Argument - Audio Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard Docket Number: 20-1199 Date Argued: 10/31/22 Play Audio: Media Formats: To download file: From Windows - Right click the "Download" link and select "Save Target As." or "Save Link As." Listen to the oral arguments. here. Bollinger and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions; and (2) whether Harvard College is violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by penalizing Asian American applicants, engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives. 21-707 (docketed on November 11, 2021) Certiorari granted by the United States Supreme Court (January 24, 2022) Oral Argument Scheduled for October 31, 2022. Email: edwardjayblum@gmail.com. of Texas. The Supreme Court hears oral argument on the University of North Carolina's race-conscious . David A. Spicer, the student body president at MIT, waited in line beginning at 8:30 p.m. Sunday night to get a seat at oral arguments. Oral argument before the First Circuit took place on September 16, 2020. In ten days, on October 31, 2022, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two very important affirmative action education cases. Facts. In ten days, on October 31, 2022, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two very important affirmative action education cases. Donate "A lot of students are interested in this issue, so I . Arlington, VA 22201. The cases were separated to allow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to participate in oral arguments for SFFA v. UNC. The first hearing, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North . In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. Suite 102-13. The Supreme Court heard oral argument concerning Harvard's race-conscious admissions policy . A lone opponent to affirmative action in higher education stands next to a rally of proponents in front of the U.S. Supreme Court before oral arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v.. Student leaders with Harvard's Affirmative Action Coalition shared statements with NewsOne, ahead of oral arguments in the two cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina Oral Argument. . She issued the following statement after the hearing: October 31, 2022. The national Lawyers' Committee and students defend Harvard's right to consider race in admissions to promote diversity and equal opportunity. Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina Oral Argument. Jul 25 2022: Brief of University Respondents filed. You can reach us by mail or email: Students for Fair Admissions. Students for Fair Admission v. President & Fellows of Harvard College Oral Argument Program ID: 523318-1 Category: Public Affairs Event Format: Judicial Proceeding Location: Washington,. In this case, Students for Fair Admissions is asking that Grutter v. Bollinger be overruled. The case: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) challenged the admissions programs of the University of North Carolina, and argued that the university's use of race as a factor in admissions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Harvard's "holistic" admissions process treats each applicant as an individual, allowing . I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. University of North Carolina. Aug 24 2022: Reply of petitioner Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. filed. Josh Blackman | 11.1.2022 2:40 AM I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. University of North Carolina. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College challenge the universities' use of race in admissions programs under both the Equal . ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, October 31, 2022. The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case challenging the University of North Carolina 's (UNC . The Lawyers' Committee participated in oral argument on behalf of student-amici. My immediate impression to the UNC case: every Justice came to the argument with their minds made Justice Jackson is recused from hearing SFFA v. Harvard due to her membership on the Harvard Board of Overseers . here. Our Cases. Students for Fair Admissions . The oral arguments in both of today's Students for Fair Admissions cases highlighted the offensiveness to the Constitution inherent in the use of race in university admissions. 54 54. Aug 31 2022: CIRCULATED: Sep 09 2022: Motion for divided argument and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed by student respondents GRANTED. 20-1199, Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard, and one hour is allotted for oral argument. In Grutter, Court held that the Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. Click here to watch SFFA's recently released video, Admission. filed. 2200 Wilson Blvd. Read the press release. Case Timeline