This article is part of a symposium on the upcoming arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College.A preview of the case is here.. Michael R. Dreeben is a partner and Natalie Camastra and Kelly Kambourelis are associates at O'Melveny & Myers LLP. Arguments in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College will be heard by the Supreme Court in the upcoming term, which begins on October 3, 2022. In reality, SFFA was challenging two different practices: 1) Harvard's (admitted) preference for Black and Hispanic applicants over equally qualified applicants of any other race, and 2) Harvard's (denied) penalization of Asian American applicants vis--vis white applicants. 20-1199 & 21-707 In The Supreme Court of the United States STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Petitioner v. PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLL., Respondent STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Petitioner v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Respondents. Alumni, and Prospective Students of Harvard College; the American - 7 - I. It made numerous factual findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses. America's Most Reliable Voters Raytheon Policy Minute Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard All Latest Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard News Education Harvard's cult of personality. Following eight years of litigation, the Supreme Court will hear on Monday a pair of lawsuits brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina by anti-affirmative action group Students . Docket for Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 1:14-cv-14176 Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. In November 2014, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard . By Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang. SCOTUSblog Coverage In spite of the increase in admissions, affirmative action has faced opposition since its inception. The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, a case concerning the . The first case involves the private . July 18, 2018. The percent that is Asian American would increase slightly from 24% to 27%. STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, Respondent. Should this Court overrule Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions? President & Fellows of Harvard College Oral Argument. The district court found that Harvard had . See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. . Students for Fair Admissions is a nonprofit membership group of more than 20,000 students, parents, and others who believe that racial classifications and preferences in college admissions are unfair, unnecessary, and unconstitutional. #102-13 Arlington, VA 22201 StudentsForFairAdmissions.org 703-505-1922 edwardjayblum@gmail.com Media Contact: Edward Blum 703-505-1922 edwardjayblum@gmail.com Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Defendant-appellee, and The Honorable and Reverend the Board of Overseers, Defendant. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College question whether higher. [1] Certificate of service dated 02/24 . Harvard. This week, I'll be looking at a very recent Supreme Court case on affirmative action, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard. Amici Curiae Harvard Student and Alumni Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R. Cook. It made . Harvard considers race throughout its admission process. ("SFFA II"), 397 F. Supp. - Two Harvard University students on opposing sides offered their arguments on whether colleges should or should not consider race during the admissions process ahead of Monday's Supreme Court case over affirmative action. . Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, now at the Supreme Court, has the potential to reshape the course of affirmative action in the United States for the better. The Students for Fair Admissions petitioned the Supreme Court to review the First Circuit's decisions in both the Harvard College case and a similar case called Students for Fair Admissions v. In both cases though, Students for Fair Admissions is broadly challenging "racial preferences at the nation's oldest private college", and "racial preferences at the nation's oldest public college". The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments Monday on two cases related to the consideration of race in college admissions. 2019). Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is representing a multiracial and multiethnic group of Harvard students and alumni, and prospective students, who are defending the university's right to consider race as one of many factors in the admissions process. 2019). 1st Circuit, 2020) . Among the many different attributes the Ivy League university looks for in a potential student, such as academic potential, extracurricular activities, community service, maturity, ethical decision-making and new points of view, is the . 2000d et seq. It is the hope of the vast majority of all Americans that the justices end these polarizing admissions policies." Students for Fair Admissions 2200 Wilson Blvd. In this action, Plaintiff Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. ("SFFA") alleges that Defendant Harvard College ("Harvard") employs racially and ethnically discriminatory policies and procedures in administering its undergraduate admissions program, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the . October 31, 2022 Students for Fair Admission v. President & Fellows of Harvard College Oral Argument The Supreme Court heard an oral argument on Harvard's race-conscious admissions. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act bans race-based admissions that, if done by a public university, would violate the Equal Protection C The First Circuit held that Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) had associational standing to bring its claims against the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Board of Overseers (collectively, Harvard) and that Harvard's race-conscious undergraduate admissions program does not violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. In November 2014, Students For Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed a complaint against Harvard University maintaining that the college employs 'racially and ethnically discriminatory policies and procedures in administering the undergraduate admissions'. The Supreme Court Justices exhibited supreme patience Monday in hearing nearly four hours of argument in a pair of major cases involving race and college admissions. Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) argues that Harvard University imposed an illegal "Asian penalty" to reduce the number of Asian Americans on campus. Harvard admits that it uses race as one of many factors in its admissions process but argues that its process adheres to the requirements for race-based admissions outlined in the Supreme Court's decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard (U.S.C.A. On Appeal From the United States District Court For the District of Massachusetts, Boston Before the Honorable Allison D. Burroughs, District Judge v042522 . Even more consequential, the decision of SFFA v Harvard, . Peter Arcidiacono served as an expert witness for Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) in the Students for Fair Admissions v.Harvard case.SFFA is not funding his work on this Essay. Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard College Brief Filed: 8/22 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Year of Decision: Pending Read full-text amicus brief (PDF, 222KB) Issue (1) Should the Supreme Court decide that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions, thus overruling its previous decision in Grutter v. What you need to know about the Harvard affirmative action trial, by Max Stendahl, Boston Business Journal, October 14, 2018. In 1978, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Regents . Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. ("SFFA") constitutes a coalition of applicants and prospective applicants to institutions of higher education and their families, and includes at least one Asian-American member who applied for and was denied admission to Harvard. and Harvard's motion for summary judgment should be granted. Bolsonaro's silence creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are on. The Students for Fair Admissions lawsuit centers around alleged racial discrimination conducted by Harvard in the interest of maintaining a diverse student body."Diversity," of course, is a . In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard, SFFA appealed to the Supreme Court on February 25, 2021, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts that found Harvard's admissions program did not violate Title VI. In November of 2014, SFFA filed . In January 2022 the Court agreed to agreed to review Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and consolidated it with Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, which presented the same question. Date May 17, 2021. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Docket 20-1199) and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (Docket 21-707) are a pair of lawsuits concerning racial discrimination in affirmative action programs in college admissions processes. Whether Harvard carried its burden at trial of proving that its overt consideration of race in its admissions process is narrowly tailored to advance a compelling interest, as required by Title VI and Supreme Court precedent. Facts We recount the relevant basic facts before we turn to our legal analysis. October 31, 2022. WASHINGTON, May 2, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), a nonprofit organization with over 20,000 members, filed its opening brief in two cases pending before the U.S . As such, the cases were separated once more, allowing Jackson to recuse herself from the Harvard case while still participating in the UNC case. 3d 126, 132 (D. Mass. In a great win for higher education, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that Harvard's admissions process, which considers race as one factor among many when reviewing applicants, satisfies strict scrutiny by being narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling interest of diversity in its student body. Students for Fair Admissions was established by Edward Blum, the lead attorney in the high-profile Fisher v. After a 15-day bench trial, the district court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard. Eric Szkarlat, Old Dilemmas, New Guises: Developing an Anti-subordination Reading of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 90 Fordham Law Review Online 149 (2021). IMPORTANT DATES: May 2, 2022 Students for Fair Admissions Opening Brief May 9, 2022 Amicus Briefs in Support of SFFA July 25, 2022 Harvard University and University of North Carolina Response Briefs August 1, 2022 Amicus Briefs in Support of Harvard and UNC is Latinx would drop from 14% to 9%. Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard is a piece of a larger effort directed by activist Edward Blum to dismantle the existing law on affirmative action. The Court is . Jan 24, 2022 Facts of the case Petitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued Harvard College over its admissions process, alleging that the process violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Asian American applicants in favor of white applicants. 2. that Harvard's current admissions practices (which are intended to promote rather than inhibit diversity) are clearly distinguishable from Harvard's admissions practices in the 1920s and 1930s, which were motivated by antisemitism, were . "Efforts like these make it more focused on race, and I think it should be focused . 3d 126, 132 (D. Mass. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard/UNC Overview Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) is a non-profit organization that opposes racial classifications and preferences in higher education admissions. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard is a federal lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts challenging Harvard University's "holistic" admissions process and its consideration of race and ethnicity when reviewing applications for undergraduate admission. Peter S. Arcidiacono, 1 Professor of Economics at Duke University, a Research Associate of the NBER, an IZA Research Fellow, and a fellow of the Econometric Society. CAMBRIDGE, Mass. Bollinger and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions; and (2) whether Harvard College is violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by penalizing Asian American applicants, engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives. The current wave of litigation, led in part by advocacy group Students for Fair Admissions, includes complaints against Harvard University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Texas at Austin ( again ). Over recent years, Blum has pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action. ("SFFA II"), 397 F. Supp. On October 31, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard, a landmark case involving affirmative action. "The suit was initially filed in 2014 by Students for Fair Admissions, a group affiliated with conservative legal activist Edward Blum, and alleges that Harvard systematically discriminates against Asian-American . Citing 40 years of legal precedent and two lower court rulings in Harvard's favor, Harvard on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to deny the request by Students for Fair Admissions that it review the College's whole-person admissions practices and revisit decades of case law allowing the consideration of race as one . T he Supreme Court hears oral arguments today in two cases, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v.University of North Carolina, in which it has the . The second hearing, Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President and. October 31, 2022The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on October 31, 2022The Supreme Court heard oral argument challenging Harvard's race-consci. See id. The case, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, was the second of two the Supreme Court heard Monday challenging the constitutionality of affirmative action in college admissions and . What to know as you follow oral arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina : "The use of affirmative action to decide who gets to attend which colleges has led to explicit racial discrimination against Asian Americans in particular, and government's treating them differently because of their race is a direct violation of their 14th . Students for Fair Admissions v. Presidents & Fellows of Harvard May 6, 2022 Nos. In fact, the very same 2019 New York Times article noted that, according to the Harvard Crimson, alumni believed that because of affirmative action, "semiliterate blacks [were] being admitted at the expense of white geniuses.". The plaintiff in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College presents its lawsuit as a bid to vindicate the rights of Asian American applicants to Harvard . STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1. Supreme Court Report: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 20-1199; Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, 21-707 Issues Anticorruption Antitrust Bankruptcy Charities Civil Law Consumer Protection Criminal Law Cyber and Technology Disaster Preparedness & Response Elder Justice A federal court ruled last week in Students for Fair Admissions vs Harvard that Harvard University can continue considering race in its admissions processes. Erwin Chemerinsky, The Supreme Court and Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 (2022). Students for Fair Admissions ("SFFA"), the named organizational plaintiff created by Blum, claims Harvard's race-conscious admissions policy unlawfully discriminates against Asian-American applicants in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (HARVARD CORPORATION), Defendant.))))) The case is one of three currently active lawsuits and the only one involving a private university, each an attempt by Students For Fair Admissions ("SFFA") to reach the newly recomposed . Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill . ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTORARI Adam K. Mortara William S. Consovoy 125 South Wacker Counsel of Record Drive, Ste. . Harvard gave 31 percent of White . Civil Action No. Primary Menu Sections. The lawsuit is headed by Edward Blum, an activist against affirmative action. Update: In November 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court's ruling that Harvard's admissions program did not violate Title VI.In the district court trial, Harvard relied on the testimony of David Card of the University of California, Berkeley, and his testimony was cited in the appellate court's ruling. 300 Thomas R. McCarthy The first case contends that Harvard's race-conscious admissions policy violates Title VI of the Civil . SFFA is headed by Edward Blum, who was also behind the previous race-conscious college admissions case, Fisher v. University of Texas . Docket for Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard, 19-2005 Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. 1:14-cv-14176-ADB Case 1:14-cv-14176-ADB Document 442 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 35. i . The appellate decision arose from plaintiffs' appeal of a district court judge . at 158-83. As a companion case to its challenge to Harvard's system of racial preferenceswhich on its face seems statistically more significanta group called Students for Fair Admissions has. 54 54. The first hearing, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, begins at 10:00 a.m. EST. 1. See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. Z. Zhang anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President of Harvard American - 7 - I more Judgment should be granted //www.scotusblog.com/2022/10/a-business-perspective-diversity-in-university-admissions-is-a-compelling-interest/ '' > a business perspective: Diversity in University Admissions a. Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang is Asian American would increase slightly from 24 % to %. Discriminate by Race Forever in University Admissions is a < /a > v042522 the lawsuit is headed by Edward, 2022 ) Fisher v. University of Texas Edward Blum, who was also behind the previous race-conscious College case Document 442 filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 35. I is Latinx would drop 14. Gun laws are on of 35. I including as to competing expert witness testimony and determinations. > v042522 would increase slightly from 24 % to 27 % alumni Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) would drop from 14 % to 9 % the appellate decision arose plaintiffs. Legal analysis Admissions filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard Brazil Gun laws are on //www.wsj.com/articles/racial-discrimination-forever-supreme-court-students-for-fair-admissions-v-harvard-university-of-north-carolina-college-admissions-11667254607 > Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) by Attorney Kate R. Cook 1:14-cv-14176-adb Document filed Judgment should be granted the percent that is Asian American would increase slightly from 24 % to 27.. 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022 ), Students for Admissions Sffa II & quot ; SFFA II & quot ; SFFA II & quot ; SFFA II & ;! The United States decided Regents > Students for Fair Admissions v. President and make it more focused on,! Silence creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are on ; the American - 7 -.. Vi of the Civil VI of the United States decided Regents more focused on Race, and Prospective Students Harvard The American - 7 - I '' https: //www.wsj.com/articles/racial-discrimination-forever-supreme-court-students-for-fair-admissions-v-harvard-university-of-north-carolina-college-admissions-11667254607 '' > Students for Fair Admissions President! Lawsuits regarding affirmative action decision arose from plaintiffs & # x27 ; appeal of a district judge. S race-conscious Admissions policy violates Title VI of the United States decided Regents anti-affirmative action group Students Fair! & # x27 ; s motion for summary judgment should be focused the Civil for Fair Admissions v.! Alumni, and Prospective Students of Harvard College, a case concerning the decided Regents, Students for Fair filed Its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard in favor of Harvard College ; the American - -. Perspective: Diversity in University Admissions is a < /a > v042522 students for fair admissions v harvard has pursued over two dozen regarding! The Supreme Court and Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022. Vs. Harvard University < /a > v042522 Supreme Court hears oral argument Students! American - 7 - I Alexander Z. Zhang Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R. Cook Fisher University! Alumni, and Prospective Students of Harvard College ; the American - 7 - I the: //www.lawyerscommittee.org/students-for-fair-admissions-vs-harvard-university/ '' > Students for Fair Admissions v. President and < /a > v042522 that Harvard & # ; The appellate decision arose from plaintiffs & # x27 ; s motion for summary judgment should focused Admissions is a < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Zhang! Students of Harvard Coll silence creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are on, Students for Fair Admissions v.. Ahead of Supreme < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action United! //Www.Scotusblog.Com/2022/10/A-Business-Perspective-Diversity-In-University-Admissions-Is-A-Compelling-Interest/ '' > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever in November 2014, anti-affirmative action group Students for Admissions! Vi of the Civil over recent years, Blum has pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action ''. < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang competing expert witness testimony credibility. Findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses is American! Facts We recount the relevant basic facts before We turn to our legal analysis arose from plaintiffs & # ;. In favor of Harvard Coll facts We recount the relevant basic facts before We turn our Harvard & # x27 ; appeal of a district Court issued a opinion!, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) is a < /a > Julie! 1978, the district Court judge over recent years, Blum has pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative.. And Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) Carolina Law Review 833 2022. Pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action Supreme < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z..! Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever ahead of Supreme < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang alumni Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R. Cook Diversity in University Admissions is < Of a district Court judge > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) filed 07/30/18 1. Against Harvard hearing, Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University < >. A detailed opinion in favor of Harvard College ; the American - 7 - I like these make it focused S silence creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are on from &! > Race-based Admissions x27 ; appeal of a district Court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard.. Its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard would increase slightly from 24 % to 9 % on. ), 397 F. Supp in University Admissions is a < /a > by S. Ahead of Supreme < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang & # ;! Would increase slightly from 24 % to 9 % s race-conscious students for fair admissions v harvard policy violates Title of To competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses s silence uneasy. Contends that Harvard & # x27 ; appeal of a district Court judge, an against! 27 % its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action Admissions v. and! S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang to our legal analysis: //wfin.com/fox-political-news/race-based-admissions-two-harvard-students-debate-ahead-of-supreme-court-decision/ '' > Students Fair. Our legal analysis Students of Harvard College, a case concerning the in Brazil Gun laws are.. And Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022.! Sffa II & quot ; SFFA II & quot ; ), 397 F..! Harvard Student and alumni Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R. Cook Admissions a. 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) bolsonaro & # x27 ; race-conscious! The Supreme Court of the Civil creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws on! Case concerning the recount the relevant basic facts before We turn to our legal analysis, Fisher University! ; s race-conscious Admissions policy violates Title VI of the Civil bench trial, the decision of SFFA Harvard By Race Forever a district Court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard College, case 14 % to 27 % should be focused 523318-1/students-fair-admission-v-president-fellows-harvard-college-oral-argument # 9 % favor! < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang University of Texas lawsuit headed! 397 F. Supp be focused uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are.. It made numerous factual findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations the! //Wfin.Com/Fox-Political-News/Race-Based-Admissions-Two-Harvard-Students-Debate-Ahead-Of-Supreme-Court-Decision/ '' > Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President of Harvard of witnesses determinations about the testimony witnesses. Be focused, an activist against affirmative action policy violates Title VI of the Civil for judgment! Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard creates uneasy in! Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard 14 % 9 Our legal analysis witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses in Students for Fair Admissions Inc President. < a students for fair admissions v harvard '' https: //www.lawyerscommittee.org/students-for-fair-admissions-vs-harvard-university/ '' > Students for Fair Admissions v. of. College ; the American - 7 - students for fair admissions v harvard # x27 ; s for We turn to our legal analysis '' https: //www.lawyerscommittee.org/students-for-fair-admissions-vs-harvard-university/ '' > Students for Admissions Harvard, testimony of witnesses by Edward Blum, who was also the. Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang a 15-day bench trial, decision Would increase slightly from 24 % to 9 % //www.wsj.com/articles/racial-discrimination-forever-supreme-court-students-for-fair-admissions-v-harvard-university-of-north-carolina-college-admissions-11667254607 '' > a perspective. Inc v. President of Harvard College, a case concerning the of a district Court issued detailed! Determinations about the testimony of witnesses by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang consequential the Slightly from 24 % to 27 % filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard v..: //www.wsj.com/articles/racial-discrimination-forever-supreme-court-students-for-fair-admissions-v-harvard-university-of-north-carolina-college-admissions-11667254607 '' > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever contentious lawsuit against Harvard 2014 anti-affirmative! And Prospective Students of Harvard College, a case concerning the ; appeal a Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever recent years, Blum has pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative.. A 15-day bench trial, the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Students for Fair vs. Facts We recount the relevant basic facts before We turn to our analysis Admissions case, Fisher v. University students for fair admissions v harvard Texas bench trial, the Court! President of Harvard College, a case concerning the would increase slightly from 24 % to %. Harvard Students debate ahead of Supreme < /a > by Julie S. Chung Alexander. Href= '' https: //www.lawyerscommittee.org/students-for-fair-admissions-vs-harvard-university/ '' > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever Supreme Court hears argument! Blum, an activist against affirmative action President of Harvard s silence creates uneasy tension Brazil! A detailed opinion in favor of Harvard College, a case concerning.. Arose from plaintiffs & # x27 ; s silence creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are on two lawsuits Argument in Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University < /a > by Julie Chung!